Skip to content
NorseRunes
Learn

What are runes?

Runes are letters. They were used to write Germanic languages for roughly thirteen centuries, and almost everything else people say about them is either later interpretation or invention.

Runes are the characters of a family of alphabets used across the Germanic-speaking world from roughly the second century AD until the end of the Middle Ages. They were carved into wood, bone, metal and stone, and they were used for the same purposes writing is normally used for: names, ownership marks, memorials, messages, prayers, jokes and insults.

That last sentence is the part most popular writing leaves out. The single most common misconception about runes is that they were primarily magical or oracular. The surviving evidence does not support that. Of the several thousand runic inscriptions we have, the overwhelming majority are mundane.

The short version

  • They are letters. Each rune stands for a sound, and they were used to spell words in a spoken language.
  • There is no single runic alphabet. There are at least four, used in different places and centuries. See all runic alphabets compared.
  • The Vikings used the Younger Futhark, a 16-rune alphabet. The 24-rune Elder Futhark that appears on most "Viking rune" charts had gone out of use before the Viking Age started.
  • Each rune also has a name, and those names are words: "hail", "ice", "birch", "need". That is where most modern rune meanings come from.
  • Runic writing outlasted the Vikings by four hundred years. Medieval runes were an ordinary everyday script in Scandinavia until about 1500.

What the surviving inscriptions actually say

The largest single body of runic material is the Bryggen find from Bergen in Norway: several hundred inscribed wooden sticks recovered from a medieval wharf. They include business correspondence, ownership tags, Latin tags, love notes, an obscene verse or two, and a message that translates roughly as "Gyða says go home".

The Viking-Age runestones of Sweden, of which there are thousands, are mostly memorials. The formula is remarkably stable: X raised this stone in memory of Y, his father or brother or son. Some add where the man died, which is how we know about expeditions to the east and to England.

A useful test

If a claim about runes cannot be traced to an inscription, a manuscript or a rune poem, it is interpretation. That is not the same as being wrong, but it is a different kind of statement, and this site labels the difference on every page.

Where the magical reputation comes from

It is not baseless. A small number of inscriptions do appear to be charms, curses or protective formulas, and Old Norse literature contains passages about carving runes for specific effects: Óðinn hanging nine nights to win them, victory runes cut on a sword hilt, a curse in three staves. Those texts are set out on runes in Old Norse literature.

But that literature was written down in the thirteenth century, centuries after the alphabets it describes, by Christian scribes recording a tradition already at a distance from them. It tells us what medieval Icelanders believed about runes. It is weaker evidence for what people in fourth-century Denmark were actually doing.

Contested

Whether runic writing was inherently magical, occasionally magical, or simply writing that was sometimes used for charms in the way any script can be, is a long-running disagreement among specialists. R. I. Page argued forcefully for the sceptical position; others read more intent into the same inscriptions.

Where the word comes from

Old Norse rún and Old English rūn both mean something like "secret" or "mystery", and the same root gives modern German raunen, "to whisper". That etymology is sound, and it is the strongest single argument for the runes having had some esoteric dimension.

It also needs careful handling. Writing itself is a kind of secret to a society where few people can read, and the same word covers "a written character" and "a confidence" in several early Germanic languages. The etymology proves the association existed; it does not settle what people did with it.

How to go deeper

Start with the alphabet you actually care about. If your interest is Vikings, read the Younger Futhark. If it is modern rune reading, that is built on the Elder Futhark. If you want to write English, the Anglo-Saxon Futhorc fits best. Then look at the rune poems, which are the primary evidence for what the runes were called.

Questions this guide answers

Are runes an alphabet or a set of symbols?
An alphabet. Each rune represents a sound and was used to spell words. Runes also have names, and those names are meaningful words, which is why they are often presented as symbols, but their primary function was writing.
Did the Vikings invent runes?
No. Runic writing is about six hundred years older than the Viking Age. The Vikings inherited a reduced version of a much older alphabet.
Can runes be read today?
Yes. Runic inscriptions are transliterated and translated routinely, and the major corpora are catalogued in searchable databases. The difficulty is not the script but the language, the damage and the terseness of the texts.
What language are runes written in?
Whichever language the carver spoke. Elder Futhark inscriptions are in Proto-Norse and other early Germanic languages, Younger Futhark in Old Norse, and futhorc in Old English or Old Frisian. Runes are a script, not a language.

Sources

Barnes 2012; Page 1987; Spurkland 2005

Full references on the sources page. Our methodology explains the evidence labels used throughout.