Skip to content
NorseRunes
Learn

Did runes have numbers?

No: the futharks have no numerals, and numbers in inscriptions are written out as words. There is exactly one exception, it is medieval, and it produced three runes that exist only to count.

The short answer is that they did not. None of the runic alphabets has a set of numerals the way Latin has I, V and X or Greek has its alphabetic numbers. A carver who needed to write a number wrote the word for it.

Attested

No runic alphabet includes numerals. Numbers in inscriptions are spelled out as words, or represented by counting marks that are not runes at all.

The flat statement is deliberate, because it rules out a whole family of claims. A rune has a sound and a name; it does not have a numeric value. Systems that assign each rune a number (usually its position in the futhark) and read meaning off the total are doing arithmetic the historical script never supported.

The one exception, and it is late

From the Middle Ages, Scandinavians made perpetual calendars on flat sticks and boards: the runic almanac, known in Norway as the primstav and in Iceland as rímstafir. These are the one place runes were used as numbers, and the way they did it is specific.

A calendar stick needs two repeating cycles. The days of the week were marked with the first seven runes of the futhark, running over and over down the stick. The years were marked with the golden number, the position of a year within the nineteen-year lunar cycle, which is what the date of Easter is calculated from.

Why the alphabet had to be extended

Here is the problem. The golden number runs from 1 to 19. The Younger Futhark has sixteen runes. Sixteen is not nineteen, so three more signs had to be invented, and they were, purely to fill the gap.

SignNameStands forUnicode
árlaug17U+16EE RUNIC ARLAUG SYMBOL
tvímaðr18U+16EF RUNIC TVIMADUR SYMBOL
belgþorn19U+16F0 RUNIC BELGTHOR SYMBOL
The only runic characters that exist to count rather than to spell. All three are encoded in the Unicode runic block; see the [Unicode runic chart](/tools/unicode-runic-chart/).

They are not runes in the ordinary sense at all. They write no sound, they head no rune-poem stanza, and outside a calendar they mean nothing. They are closer to a numeral than to a letter, which makes them the exception that shows how firmly the rest of the alphabet was not numeric.

Why nineteen?

Nineteen years is the Metonic cycle: after nineteen years the phases of the moon fall on very nearly the same calendar dates again. Knowing where a year sits in that cycle is what lets you calculate Easter, which is why a nineteen-position counter was worth building an alphabet extension for.

What this does not mean

  • Runes do not have numeric values. Numbering them 1–24 by their position in the futhark is a modern convenience for talking about them, not a property they carry.
  • There is no runic numerology. Systems that add up rune positions to produce a reading are 20th-century constructions. See rune meanings.
  • Counting marks are not runes. Inscriptions sometimes tally things with plain strokes. A stroke is a stroke, and reading a row of them as repeated isaz is a common error on damaged objects.
  • The calendar is medieval and Christian. The runic almanac belongs with medieval runes, several centuries after the Viking Age, and its whole purpose is calculating a Christian festival.
Modern

Assigning each rune a number and reading meaning from the sum is a modern practice with no historical basis. The only numeric use of runes that is attested is positional (a golden number or a weekday marker on a calendar stick), and it carries no meaning beyond the count.

Questions this guide answers

Did runes have numbers?
No. The runic alphabets have no numerals, and numbers in inscriptions are written out as words. The single exception is the medieval runic calendar, where runes were used positionally as golden numbers.
What are árlaug, tvímaðr and belgþorn?
Three signs invented for the medieval runic calendar to represent 17, 18 and 19, because the sixteen-rune Younger Futhark could not reach nineteen on its own. They write no sound and appear nowhere outside calendars. All three are encoded in Unicode.
Do runes have numerological values?
Not historically. Numbering the runes by their position in the futhark is a modern convenience, and systems that add those numbers up to produce a reading are 20th-century inventions.
How did runic inscriptions write dates?
In words. Medieval Scandinavian inscriptions that give a year spell it out, and the runic calendar tracks the year by position on a stick rather than by writing a number.

Sources

Barnes 2012; Spurkland 2005; The Unicode Standard, Runic block (U+16A0–U+16FF)

Full references on the sources page. Our methodology explains the evidence labels used throughout.